beta
Text
Defendant
The defendant 4 months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime No. 1 and No. 2 of the judgment A, and for the crime No. 4 of the judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2017 Highest 1100 [criminal records] Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment in October 2017 with prison labor for embezzlement and the judgment on January 18, 2017 became final and conclusive on January 10, 201.
[Criminal facts]
1. The Defendants’ joint fraud in collusion with each other, and at the “D” office located in Ansan-si, Seoul-si, Seoul-si, on August 21, 2015, the victim E is conducting real estate business.
The loan borrowed money to be used as office expenses. It was false that the real estate business in Ansan-do would be repaid if it is well-grounded.
However, even though the Defendants attempted to operate real estate business with the trade name "D", they did not have any money to invest in the business, there was no project in Ansan, and even if they borrowed money from the damaged party due to the difficulties in living conditions, such as there was no certain amount of income, there was no intention or ability to repay the money.
Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim and then acquired 7 million won by receiving 7 million won as the borrowed money from the victim on the same day.
2. On April 22, 2015, Defendant A’s sole fraud concluded that “F, G, and H is an investor of the victim E at Sincheon-dong, Sincheon-dong, Sincheon-dong, and that “In this context, the real estate business conducted at Sinsan-si and Ansan-si is only a little amount of contract, and there is a big contract, so only if the contract is entered into, a few hundred millions of millions of money and the lending of money to use at the expense of real estate.”
However, the defendant did not have any real estate business in progress at the time, and even if he borrowed money from the damaged person due to the difficulty of living conditions such as no certain income, he did not have any intention or ability to repay it.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim and received KRW 1.5 million from the victim on the same day as the loan money, from the time on which he/she received from the victim, to December 20, 2015, totaled 34 times, such as the list of crimes in the annexed list.