logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.04.08 2014고정384
폭행치상등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, which is a management company of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, is the franchise for Dong-dong Development, and the victim F (n, 46 years old) is the auditor of the above apartment council. After being audited, the defendant did not renew the contract and attached an open bid for the reason that Dong-dong Development is erroneous for apartment management.

On October 11, 2013, at around 15:45, 2013, the Defendant: (a) sought friendship development from the victim F in front of the G apartment of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) sought the same at the same time with the victim F; (c) but the victim did not come out of the management office, and (d) took back the back part of the victim’s clothes and the lower part of the back part of the victim’s clothes with his hand, as his hand, and sound “Idd, hick, hick,” and sound the victim’s right shoulder, “Id, hick, hick, hick, hick, etc., and 2 through 3 mick, and caused the victim to incur injury, such as salt, tension, tension, and other tension with the part of the victim’s 21-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Protocol of examination of the witnessF;

1. Some statements in the protocol of examination of a witness I concerning the witness I;

1. A written diagnosis of injury to the F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the part of the F's arms;

1. Article 262 of the Criminal Act and Articles 262, 260 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The summary of the charge of defamation among the facts charged in this case under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant committed an act of incompetence by making several statements to the effect that, around 16:00 on October 11, 2013, the Defendant, at the G Apartment Management Office of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the victim F, who is the above apartment management manager, did not engage in an act of incompetence, and that, inasmuch as accounting I, 1, and 2, K, etc. are heard by the above apartment management manager, the victim committed an act of incompetence.

arrow