1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. Basic facts

A. On January 26, 2016, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by Defendant C, a medical specialist of Defendant B Hospital (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant hospital”) due to the left-hand knee’s pere and the side knee pere pere, and was diagnosed by Defendant C, a medical specialist of the knee pere pere.

(hereinafter “instant surgery”). B.

On February 22, 2016, the medical record area of this case stated that the 4 weeks prior to the instant surgery is doubtful, and that there is a dynamic book and a dynamic book of the post on March 16, 2016, and that there is any inconvenience in the post-control room on April 11, 2016.

C. After the instant surgery, the Plaintiff complained of symptoms that stand down on the left-hand knee and walked down, and conducted a telescopic test at the Defendant Hospital on April 19, 2016, and recorded as a superscopic damage to the postscopic.

After that, on June 24, 2016, the Plaintiff was found to have suffered from damage to the leadership of the U.S. from the Dental Department located in the Geum-gu Busan Metropolitan Government through the Mesical inspection. On July 2, 2016, the Plaintiff was found to have suffered from the MRI's reading results in the MRI's Mesical reading from the Mesical department located in the Busan Metropolitan Government.

On July 5, 2016, the Plaintiff received re-performance, which is an anti-defluenction, from the foregoing D (D) sector, and re-performance, which was the latter 19 July 19, 2016, as the latter 201.

E. On December 8, 2016, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the F Hospital located in Masung-si as the left-hand scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic sc

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 to 4 evidence, Eul 2 to 9 evidence (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. If the Plaintiff had already been pansive to the Plaintiff prior to the instant surgery, the instant surgery was performed.