Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who was granted credit loans from the victim C Co., Ltd. (the representative D; hereinafter referred to as the “victim Co., Ltd.”), had been subject to seizure of the Defendant’s account for about 18 days by omitting the settlement of debt, and thus, the Defendant mobilized disabled persons whose name cannot be known due to the omission of the settlement of debt, and demanded the Chairperson interview and compensation for damage, etc. in front of the sentiments of the victim Co., Ltd., and conducted assemblies and demonstrations.

On June 24, 2015, from around 09:40 to around 11:30 of the same day, the Defendant saw a banner stating that “the victim company forged documents or committed litigation fraud” in the vicinity of the victim company located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, the victim company saw that “the victim company was frighted,” “the victim company was frighted,” “the victim frightd,” “the lawsuit fraud group,” and “the customer frightd,” and led the victim company 16 persons with disabilities whose name cannot be known, and led the victim company flad, flad, and flad, and flad, flad with the victim company flad, the victim company flad, and flad with the victim company flad, the victim company f

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with 16 disabled persons who are unable to know their names, thereby hindering the business of the victim company and its employees.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A complaint;

1. Case progress (the case of seizure and collection order);

1. Notice of reasons for non-prosecution;

1. A notice on the result of each suspected fact;

1. Details of the case of application for adjudication (Seoul High Court 2015 Elementary High Court 44);

1. Demonstration photographs;

1. Placards photographs;

1. Application of the video-related Acts and subordinate statutes to the intrusion of buildings and interfere with business;

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 310 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination of the defendant's defense counsel's assertion of provisional payment order under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act