Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. The plaintiff's judgment on the ground of the plaintiff's claim is a person who has completed registration of credit business, etc. and credit business pursuant to the Act on Registration of Credit Business, etc. and Protection of Finance Users while running the credit business under the name of "D". The defendant B is jointly and severally liable for the above loan obligations against the defendant B at the time of the defendant C (the father of the defendant B) with a maturity of 10 million won and a maturity of 5 million won every two times on September 1, 2008 and September 11, 2008. The defendant C (the father of the defendant B) jointly and severally guaranteed the above loan obligations against the plaintiff at the time of the payment. The defendants' payment of interest only by December 31, 2010 does not conflict between the parties, or the purport of pleading as stated in the evidence Nos. 1, 6, 11, and 3 or 3 cannot be acknowledged. Thus, the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the above loan and delay damages to the plaintiff.
2. Determination as to the defendants' defense of repayment
A. In full view of the aforementioned evidence, Gap evidence Nos. 7, 8, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and Eul evidence Nos. 1, 1, 2, and 4, the whole purport of the pleadings is as follows: ① The plaintiff, defendant B, and Eul agreed to settle the unpaid interest and interest as of the same date on January 1, 2012 with 14.9 million won and to accept E concurrently; ② The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Eul seeking payment of the above loan obligation (this Court Decision 2012No357945) and then received the lawsuit against the plaintiff on Nov. 15, 2012, "E was paid with 14.9 million won and the amount calculated at the rate of 4.8% per annum from January 1, 2012 to the date of full payment, and the plaintiff received the lawsuit from the Central District Court No. 9300, Mar. 21, 2013.