logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.07.04 2017고단3626
근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, in the facts charged, is a company C manager in Jeju Special Self-Governing City B, who ordinarily employs 75 workers and engages in a mantheses business.

When an employee retires, an employer shall pay a retirement allowance within 14 days from the date on which the cause for such payment occurred.

Provided, That the payment date may be extended by mutual agreement between the parties in extenuating circumstances.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not pay KRW 3,609,200 of D retirement pay from December 23, 2014 to March 10, 2016 within 14 days from the date of retirement without agreement between the parties on the extension of payment deadline.

2. Judgment dismissing public prosecution

(a) Crimes of non-violation of will: The proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Retirement Benefits of Workers;

(b) Declaration of non-existence of punishment after prosecution: Withdrawal of a petition on May 10, 2017;

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow