1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The judgment of the court of first instance is just even if a new examination is conducted by comprehensively taking into account all the evidence, including the evidence submitted in the trial, as to the defendants' arguments cited in the judgment of the court of first instance.

Therefore, the reasoning for this Court’s entry is as follows: (a) the reasoning for this case is as follows: (b) the first instance court’s judgment is the same as the reasoning for the first instance judgment, except for the addition of the following matters: (c) the first instance court’s “the fact that there was an excess of the obligation” in Part 7

Defendant A had a claim for return of KRW 128 million with active property around September 20, 2017, the real estate of this case, and KRW 80 million with KRW 123,941,833 (based on principal) with passive property, F Bank’s debt amounting to KRW 76 million with KRW 161,89,359 with KRW Q Bank’s debt amounting to KRW 161,618,618,000 with KRW 20 million with respect to the real estate of this case, and KRW 80,000 with respect to KRW 80,000,000,000 with the real estate of this case, and KRW 123,941,83,359 with the real estate of this case, and KRW 80,000,000 with reference to the real estate of this case, but it is difficult to view that the above lease deposit was not refunded with respect to the real estate of this case before the conclusion of the sales contract of this case.

2. Accordingly, the judgment of the first instance court is just in conclusion, and all appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.