1. The defendant,

A. The Plaintiff A’s KRW 150 million and the interest rate of KRW 20% per annum from August 15, 2014 to the date of full payment.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiffs and the defendant are children between D and E.

On the other hand, D and E included the plaintiffs and the defendant as shown in the following table.

The name of the sequence 1 F G 2, 1994, death 2, South C (Defendant) H 3, South A (Plaintiff) 14, J5 J Ha 6, South M N7 Y Y 7, South, North 1, 194

B. D died on May 9, 1982 (the date of actual death: May 1981); and E on February 9, 1990 (the date of actual death: June 198), respectively.

C. The Defendant, around May 2006, stated that at any restaurant located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, siblings, including the Plaintiffs (excluding M who had resided in the U.S. at that time), including the Plaintiffs, (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant land”), there is a person who seeks to purchase KRW 600 million per day at a certain restaurant located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, about the level of KRW 1,488 square meters, and KRW 1,765 square meters before R. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant land”). K has already received Heung-gu S and T land, but K will divide the price of the instant land into a net and pay KRW 60 million per day to the Plaintiffs, M andO, respectively.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant agreement”). 【No dispute exists, Gap evidence 1-1, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 15, Gap evidence 16, Gap evidence 16, Gap evidence 18, Gap evidence 19-1, Gap evidence 20-1, witness O, Eul evidence 20, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Summary of the parties’ assertion

A. The plaintiffs purchased the land of this case before the net D's birth and entrusted only the name of the owner to the defendant.

In May 2006, the Defendant agreed to pay KRW 150,000,000 to the Plaintiffs, M, andO, respectively, for the purpose of distributing the instant real estate, which is the inherited property they managed.

The instant agreement constitutes a non-exclusive agreement for the purpose of distributing inherited property as a non-exclusive agreement.

However, the Defendant paid KRW 100 million to M in 2013 and KRW 100 million to O in 2014, respectively, as the implementation of the instant agreement, but the Plaintiffs are also paid the interest rate.