Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. (1) The judgment of the court below that convicted the Defendant of the charges of indecent act by compulsion and confinement on the part of the charges of indecent act by compulsion, although the Defendant did not have any intention on confinement, is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles or erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles, by misapprehending the legal principles, while naturally contacted the body of the victim in the process of reconciliation after pointing out the truth or pointing out

(2) The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (four years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. A prosecutor (1) misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles did not directly dancing the kitchen knife to the victim, but the defendant saw the kitchen knife to the victim and threatened the victim, and in such a process, the court below acquitted the victim of the charge of causing bodily injury, which was erroneous in misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles.

(2) The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the defendant's assertion of misunderstanding of facts or misapprehension of legal principles, the court below also argued that the defendant is identical to the above assertion of misunderstanding of facts or misapprehension of legal principles, and the court below rejected such assertion in detail. In light of the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable. Thus, this part

나. 검사의 사실오인 또는 법리오해에 주장에 대하여 원심은, 피해자가 법정에서 ‘피고인이 이 사건 상해 범행 당시 화가 나 싱크대로 가서 “아이씨, 콱”이라고 말하면서 부엌칼을 잠시 쥐었다가 놓았을 뿐 부엌칼을 들고 와 피해자를 위협하거나 피해자에게 상해를 가할 당시 부엌칼을 휴대하거나 이용한 사실이 없다’는 취지로 명확하게 진술하고 있는 점,...