logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.10.25 2019나52321
용역비
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. Paragraph 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance is applicable.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person running cleaning service business under the trade name of “C,” and the Defendant is a person running a miscellaneous retail business under the trade name of “D.”

B. From August 2017 to April 2018, the Plaintiff made cleaning of a foreigner’s apartment unit designated by the Defendant and received service charges from the Defendant as indicated below.

The service price (filing Date) from August 21, 2017 to September 20, 2017; the number 8,12,50 from September 21, 2017 to October 16, 2017; the number 122,50 from October 17, 2017 to October 16, 20; the number 6.5 from October 17, 208 to November 15, 2017; the number 1.6.5 from October 17, 2017 to November 15, 2017; the purport of 1.6.4 from October 17, 2017 to 3.6.5 from November 15, 2017; and the purport of 1.6.5 from November 2015 to 208; and the purport of 1.6.5 from November 16, 2017 to December 15, 2017.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion, upon the Defendant’s request, has engaged in apartment cleaning during the period from April 16, 2018 to July 15, 2018, in addition to the period of cleaning services indicated in the above basic facts. The Defendant filed a claim with the Defendant for the service payment of KRW 6,241,50 on May 15, 2018, for the service payment of KRW 8,093,525 on June 15, 2018, for the service payment of KRW 8,093,525 on June 15, 2018, and for the service payment of KRW 6,60,000 on July 8, 2018, the Defendant did not pay the service payment.

Therefore, the defendant is liable to pay each service price and damages for delay to the plaintiff.

B. The Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant received an order from E, a prime contractor, (hereinafter “E”), and concluded a contract with the Plaintiff by requesting a simple cleaning service. On April 16, 2018, the Defendant received notice from E that the order for cleaning service is terminated, and notified the Plaintiff of the termination of the cleaning service contract on the same day.

The defendant from April 16, 2018 to July 15, 2018.

arrow