1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

On December 14, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for occupancy in the main village industrial complex (hereinafter “the instant contract for occupancy”) with the management agency of the main village industrial complex falling under the general industrial complex under Article 2 subparag. 14 of the Industrial Cluster Development and Factory Establishment Act (hereinafter “the main village industrial complex”), which is an incorporated association of the main village industrial complex (hereinafter “the main village industrial complex council”) on December 14, 2013, as a corporation established with the special tea manufacturing business, etc. for the purpose of business, and entered into a contract for occupancy in the main village industrial complex (hereinafter “the instant contract for occupancy”) with the Special village industrial complex operation council (hereinafter “the main village industrial complex council”) located within the main village industrial complex located within the main village.

On December 22, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of comprehensive automobile maintenance business and the Defendant’s refusal disposition with the Defendant for registration (hereinafter “instant application for registration”) pursuant to Article 53(1) of the Automobile Management Act and Article 111(1) of the Enforcement Rule of the Automobile Management Act for the purpose of establishing an automobile maintenance business of a size of 1,489 square meters in building area at the instant application site.

On December 29, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition to refuse the above application for registration (hereinafter “instant disposition”) according to the response of the council of the mountain village councils, which concluded that the comprehensive maintenance business of automobiles is impossible to move into a repair business, to the main industrial complex, which is a general industrial complex where the instant application is located.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 23 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings, plaintiff's assertion of the purport of the whole pleadings, and the disposition of this case by the plaintiff of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes should be revoked for the following reasons.

According to the current status of the mountain village group (Evidence A7) prepared by the mountain village group council, which does not fall under the category of business restricted to occupancy in the mountain village group.