The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (10 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination: (a) there are favorable grounds for sentencing, such as the fact that the defendant is living against the victim while making a confession of the crime; (b) the investigative agency and the court below agreed with the victims of the crime of bodily injury, special intimidation, and the crime of bodily injury; (c) the receipt of a letter from police officers who interfered with the performance of official duties; (d) the address and minor children are not suffering from the crime of property damage; and (e) there are three instances of punishment for violent crimes; (c) there are three instances of punishment and punishment sentenced for more than several times; (d) the crime of violation of the Narcotics Control Act on April 21, 2016; and (e) the crime of this case was committed within six months of imprisonment with prison labor for more than three years; and (e) the degree of injury suffered by the victim E is significant; and (e) the defendant's age, family status, economic situation, circumstances and motive leading up to the crime; and (e) the records and changes in the sentencing expressed in this case, the judgment of the court below is not reasonable and reasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure as to the application of the law of the court below's judgment after the ordinary concurrence of "the choice of imprisonment" in the application of the law of the court