A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 5, 2009, the Defendant against the victim B is expected to raise the pneumoconiosis level to the victim B at the agricultural agricultural parking lot located in 169, the Gangwon-gu Gangwon-gun, which was located in 169.

In order to request the doctor to the doctor in charge of pneumoconiosis rating members, it is necessary to pay 7 million won.

“The purpose was to make a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant received the above money from the injured party, he did not have any intention or ability to raise the pneumoconiosis grade.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 3 million on April 8, 2009, around KRW 3 million on or around April 9, 2009, KRW 1 million on or around April 9, 2009, KRW 1 million on or around May 2010, KRW 700,000 on or around March 3, 201, and KRW 3 million on or around March 2, 201, and KRW 1 million on or around September 22, 201.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On July 9, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The victim D, in the container stuff of the Defendant’s residence located in Gangwon-gun E, Gangwon-gun, the Defendant paid a deposit money to the victim D with the payment of the deposit money for lease on a deposit basis.”

However, the defendant was not the owner of the above tenement house and was living with the defendant.

G (name after the opening of the house: H) on December 27, 2004, the owner of the house in question entered into a lease contract with I on a deposit basis with 25 million won on the previous owner of the house in question. G, after he was the Defendant and the Defendant, sent a certificate of the contents of notification of termination of the lease contract to J on December 14, 2006, and the Defendant had to return the said house to the owner of the house in question. Therefore, the Defendant did not have the ability to establish the right to lease on a deposit basis to the victim.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, extended the period of lease on a deposit basis on August 7, 201 and the period of lease on a deposit basis on July 18, 201 by extending the period of lease on a deposit basis.