logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.07.23 2015구합59631
출국금지기간연장처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s business and national tax arrears 1) The Plaintiff engaged in the wholesale and retail business of medical devices with the trade name B, but discontinued the above business around 2002. 2) The Plaintiff was delinquent in national tax (hereinafter “instant national tax”) of KRW 199,283,00 as of November 20, 2014, due to the Plaintiff’s delinquency in payment of global income tax and value-added tax for the year 2001, and for the year 2002.

3) Since the date of the foregoing default on national taxes, the Plaintiff did not voluntarily pay the national taxes in arrears until the date of the closing of argument in this case, and the head of Seocho District Tax Office conducted a tracking investigation on the Plaintiff’s property, but did not verify the property in the name of the Plaintiff located in Korea. (B) There are wife C (1969) and his wife D (194. birth) and son E (1996.) as the Plaintiff’s family member, while his children were studying in Canada from around 2005 to the date of closing of argument in this case, both wife and son are currently staying in Canada.

2) C remitted the sum of KRW 58,886,00 from around December 2005 to around 2008. (c) The Plaintiff related to entry and departure has been in the Republic of Korea over 36 times between November 2001 to September 2009, and the period of overseas stay is at least 2 days to 40 days. (d) The Defendant, upon the request of the Commissioner of the National Tax Service, took a disposition prohibiting the departure of the Plaintiff on December 17, 2009 (from December 18, 2009 to June 17, 201) based on Article 4(1)4 of the Immigration Control Act (from June 201, 201 to June 17, 201).

2) After June 13, 2015, the Defendant issued a disposition to extend the period of prohibition of departure from June 18, 2015 to December 17, 2015 to the Plaintiff based on Article 4-2(1) of the Immigration Control Act (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

(B) A. (No dispute exists, A. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, and B’s 1 to 6 (if any) are included in each number.

arrow