1. For the plaintiffs:

A. Defendant D and Defendant E shall be KRW 24,000,000 and shall be from April 27, 2018 to the date of full payment.

Basic Facts

On June 3, 2014, H (hereinafter “H”) entered into a lease agreement with the Plaintiffs and the Plaintiffs to lease a deposit of KRW 300 million, monthly rent of KRW 28 million, and the lease period from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 202 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). He agreed that, without the Plaintiffs’ consent, the use or structure of the instant commercial building shall be altered, or that, without any sublease, lease shall not be used for any purpose other than for lease.

On September 25, 2014, H and H drafted a protocol of protocol prior to filing a lawsuit (Seoul Eastern District Court 2014No. 441, hereinafter “instant protocol of protocol”) stating that “H shall order the Plaintiffs to submit the entire commercial buildings of this case on June 30, 202, and that “H shall order the Plaintiffs to submit the entire commercial buildings of this case for more than three consecutive years, delayed the use of a car, or transfer the right of lease or sub-lease the commercial buildings of this case without the Plaintiffs’ consent.”

H concluded a transfer security agreement with J, K, and L on November 26, 2015 with respect to the claim to return the lease deposit under the instant lease agreement, and notified the transfer by content-certified mail.

On April 6, 2017, the Plaintiffs sent to H a certificate of content that the instant lease agreement is terminated according to the instant protocol of conciliation, as the amount of rent overdue by H reaches three times, and reached H on April 7, 2017.

H On May 12, 2017, Defendant F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant F”) and Defendant F entered into an entrusted operation agreement with the following terms: (a) Defendant F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant F”) to pay KRW 38 million to H each month while operating the store from May 18, 2017 to August 17, 2018 (hereinafter “instant store”).