beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 9,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
The Defendants respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. At around 03:40 on June 5, 2014, Defendant A, at the same time, was under the influence of alcohol with “Eel” in the front parking lot of “Eel” located in Gui-si, Gui-si, and was under the influence of alcohol with “two males.” The Defendant received a report 112, and was urged to return home from G to the superintendent of the police station affiliated with the F District of the Guri Police Station, which called the said place.
The Defendant, without any justifiable reason after shouldering in diving, expressed to the above G himself that “I am a ice,” and “I am a string in the future of the Chewing fice,” it is unnecessary to do so. He ambling embling fright,” and she assaults the above G ambling of the Defendant, which she was in front of the Defendant, at the seat of her seat three times, with the warning that it falls under the obstruction of the performance of the performance of the duties of the police officer, and if the above G assaults assaults the Defendant, he saw that “I am a ice,” and she was frighting the drum for a parking marking sign, which was placed front of the above parking lot, and she was frighting with the patrol box, and she was frighting with the above G ambling, and she was frighting with the above G son’s hand.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.
2. Defendant B, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph (1), committed assault, such as: (a) the Defendant’s act of arresting the Defendant as a flagrant offender of the obstruction of performance of official duties from police officers, such as the police officer of the Guri Police Station F District G, and (b) the Defendant’s act of assaulting the Defendant at one time on the right side of the above G’s head.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Examination protocol of Defendant A by the prosecution;
1. The suspect interrogation protocol of Defendant B against the police officer