Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

From March 2016, the Defendant had been on April 3, 2017 while serving as the representative in Section B(62)C and Section D of this major shareholder.

From the end of March 2017, the Defendant was defective as having no interest in the victim. However, the Defendant submitted the company data held by the Defendant to related agencies and would be able to understand the company.

“The phrase was made.”

On April 3, 2017, the Defendant is trying to conduct a tax investigation and investigation agency if he or she becomes aware of her fluority by using a Handphone of the victim.

In this sense, it is difficult to do so.

“Sa. Sa. Sa. Sa. Sa. Sa. Sa. Sa. Sa. Sa. Sa. Sa. Sa. Sa. Sa. Sa. Sa. Wa. Sa. Sa. Sa. Sa. Sa. Sa. Sa.

When the head of the Gu intends to dialogue, it is good to see it as a conversation.

“Transmitting text messages.”

(v) intimidation was made.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness B, E, F, and G;

1. A certificate for all registered matters;

1. National pension (report, etc. on the loss of qualification for insurance);

1. Application of the statutes on employment insurance to the National Pension;

1. Relevant Article 283 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the defendant and his/her defense counsel shall not be subject to intimidation only with the above text;

The argument is asserted.

Intimidation means a threat of harm to an extent that it may cause a person to feel a fear, and an offender will directly engage in harm and injury.

Of course, a threat of harm may be made not only by informing a third party, but also by means of having the third party engage in the harm. Thus, a person who either made an explicit or implied speech or behavior or made a third party act to believe that the notifying party is in a position to de facto control the third party’s act or to have an influence on the third party.