The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal - The fact-finding DNA did not work as the newspaper company at the time of the instant case, in light of the fact that D continued to use the electricity at the place of the instant crime even before the date of the instant crime, and that D continued to use the electricity at the place of the instant crime, even after the date of the instant crime, and was taken a short measure as of October 31, 2012, in view of the fact that D was engaged in the newspaper company’s duties at the time of the instant crime.

2. Determination:

A. The lower court determined that: (a) even based on D’s statement, D did not publish paper newspapers at the time of the instant case; (b) KK corporation operated by D was dissolved as a dormant company on December 5, 201, which was about 10 months prior to the instant case; and (c) the instant three domain names were deleted from July 13, 2012, to August 8, 2012, when it testified that D was working outside the Republic of Korea from Seoul for the purpose of sports; (d) however, there was no evidence to acknowledge that D had been working outside the instant building on October 2012, and that D had not been acquitted on the grounds that it had already been working on September 13, 2012, and that it was not proven that D had already been working on the instant building, and that the instant three domain names were not used on the grounds that D had already been seized.

B. According to the records of the trial at the time of this case, the defendant and D at the time of this case can recognize the fact that they did not have good appraisal in a conflict state, such as filing a civil lawsuit as a matter of eviction.