beta
Text
The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment of innocence against the Defendants is published.
Reasons
1. Defendant A used an independent room within the office of law firm I located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from February 2, 2012 to October 2014; Defendant A used the name of adviser of the said law firm; Defendant B was a person who worked as an assistant to Defendant A’s office.
Defendant
A has been in charge of auction affairs for at least 30 years in relation to the Jeju District Court L's voluntary auction cases (hereinafter referred to as "the auction of the real estate in this case") on 44 parcels owned by the J (SS 64 tax and death on September 15, 2014) at the above office from the Haman on July 5, 2013 to October 2013, since he/she himself/herself has been in charge of auction affairs for at least 30 years, he/she has been in charge of the relevant affairs. It means that he/she is well aware of the relevant affairs, while he/she has been delivered KRW 16 million from J on August 5, 2013, and five million from October 4, 2013, it is possible to postpone the bidding date and make a decision to cancel the commencement of auction on behalf of him/her if he/she has sold the said real estate in return for the debt.
around August 5, 2013, Defendant B prepared an objection to a decision to commence an auction and a proposal of “application for a change in the bidding date” using the computer at the place of the Defendant A’s oral statement, and Defendant A submitted the said documents to the Jeju District Court located in the five-lane north of Jeju on August 6, 2013.
In addition, the Defendants conspired, from around that time to April 14, 2014, received a total of KRW 56 million from J with respect to the auction of the real estate of this case, as described in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes, and dealt with legal affairs, including legal counseling and preparation of legal documents.
2. The summary of the Defendants’ assertion is only that Defendant A introduced MO attorney-at-law of law firm I and N's O attorney-at-law of law firm to process the auction of the instant real estate, and as stated in the facts charged, Defendant A provided legal counseling to J or prepared legal documents and provided compensation therefor.