The defendant shall be innocent.

1. From December 2012 to January 2013, the Defendant stated that “The fact within the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D apartment complex was in the marital relation where the victim E and F reported marriage,” the Defendant stated that “H (the victim F Ka P F F F F F F F F F’s name), who lives as auditor, is not a normal couple, is not a single couple, but a single couple,” and that “The two were still in the mountainous district.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the honor of victims by openly pointing out false facts.

2. Determination

A. The witness G, F, and I’s statements are each made by the witness G, F, and I as evidence consistent with the facts charged. They are not consistent with the following and they are contradictory to each other.

1) A person who made a statement of the accused, such as the statement in the facts charged in the witness G’s statement, is now G. G. The police station stated that G was the same in the vicinity of the apartment 3 Blux management office, but the prosecution did not memory several complexes, and the court stated that there was no consistency in the place near the management office parking lot again in the court. G was a police officer on January 2013 at the time when the statement from the accused was made. The prosecutor stated that the police officer was a police officer on December 2012 at the same time as the stated in the facts charged, and that the prosecutor stated that the election period was accurate, or around January 2013, whether the resident representative was the election period, and that the time was not specified. G was the same as the statement in the facts charged by the accused from the Defendant to the investigation agency and the investigation agency, but did not make a statement at least 4-5 and 20 of G. 20.