logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.21 2016가단75822
임대차보증금반환
Text

1. Defendant B shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 12,00,000, Defendant C, D, E, F, G, and H, respectively, KRW 8,00,00.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 9, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “lease”) with respect to the fourth floor of the GI and the multi-household housing located in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant housing”) with a deposit of KRW 60 million and the term of the contract from September 24, 2011 to September 23, 2013.

B. The Plaintiff paid the deposit and occupied the instant house.

After that, the instant lease agreement was extended by September 23, 2015.

C. The deceased on February 6, 2016, and the deceased on February 6, 2016, the deceased’s heir, Defendant C, D, E, F, G, and H, who is the wife, and the wife.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3 (including paper numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Since the instant lease agreement has expired on September 23, 2015, the Defendants, the heir of the deceased I, are obligated to return the said deposit KRW 60 million to the Plaintiff according to their respective inheritance shares.

Therefore, Defendant B is obligated to pay KRW 12 million (60 million x 3/15 of the inheritance share) to the Plaintiff, Defendant C, D, E, F, G, and H, respectively, KRW 8 million (60 million x 2/15 of the inheritance share).

3. The plaintiff's claim for the conclusion is justified and acceptable.

arrow