The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the petitioner (quasi-Appellant).

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

According to its reasoning, the court below recognized that E representing the respondent (sub-Review Plaintiff) at the time of the filing of the instant lawsuit was not a legitimate representative of the respondent (sub-Review Plaintiff), and rejected all of the respondent's claims on the ground of its reasoning that the respondent (sub-Review Plaintiff) was not a party to the instant lawsuit telephone, that the instant lawsuit was filed with the intention to have the period of quasi-Review, or that the respondent (sub-Review Plaintiff) confirmed the appointment of the representative of E implicitly, or that the respondent (sub-Review Plaintiff) confirmed the appointment of

Examining the record in light of the relevant legal principles, the above determination by the court below is justifiable. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on quasi-examination period, implied ratification, etc.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.