1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. (1) On October 27, 1997, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was living in the Army on February 9, 1998 after being transferred to a driver’s disease in the 1113 Camped Zone B of the Army on February 9, 1998, and appealed to the right-hand knee, and was under medical care at the knenee and the knee reduction, and was under medical care at the knee, but there was no knife of the knife, as a result of the examination of the knife Hospital of the National Armed Forces, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “the knife knife outside the knife for half

On October 22, 199, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Armed Forces Daejeon Hospital, and was in force on November 11, 1999, “Instituous anti-scopic anti-scopic anti-scopic anti-scopic anti-scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics

On January 17, 200, according to the medical doctor's opinion that it is difficult for the Plaintiff to perform military service after surgery, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on January 17, 200, and on May 7, 2014, the Central Patriots and Veterans Hospital was implementing the "relicative transplant on the first half of the half of the year."

on November 13, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State with the following content.

Article 52 of the Civil Procedure Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") provides that the defendant shall not be a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State, but shall not be a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State, and shall be punished by Grade 7, 8122 as a result of the physical examination, and shall be determined by Grade 7, 8122 as a result of the physical examination.

On September 10, 2015, the Plaintiff submitted an application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State to the effect that the instant wounds were recognized as persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State.

(v) Accordingly, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition against the Plaintiff on December 19, 2015 on the ground that “the instant wounds do not constitute the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State” (hereinafter “instant disposition”), subject to deliberation and resolution by the 300th Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement in 2015.

⑹ 원고는 2016. 2. 11. 이 사건 처분에 불복하여 중앙행정심판위원회에...