1. The defendant shall pay the plaintiff KRW 80,000,000.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3.Paragraph 1.

In addition to the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 1, around July 6, 2013, the plaintiff concluded a lease contract with a lease deposit of KRW 80 million, the lease term of KRW 24 months from August 15, 2013, the lease contract was implicitly renewed after the termination of the above lease term. The defendant purchased the instant detached house on September 6, 2016, and the plaintiff delivered the defendant with an intention to refuse to renew the above lease contract on November 2017.

According to the above facts, the defendant who succeeded to the status of the lessor is obligated to return to the plaintiff the above lease deposit amount of KRW 80 million as the restoration following the termination of the lease contract for the instant detached house.

If so, the plaintiff's claim is accepted.