logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.01.30 2019고단6099
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 29, 2019, at around 08:05, the Defendant driven a Kanche vehicle within a three-meter radius from the roads near the Gyeonggi Suwon-si B in the Gyeonggi Suwon-si, to the two-story parking lots in the Dongwon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notify the results of drinking driving control;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (3) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasoning of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Order of Education and the Order of Community Service committed a second offense despite the fact that the defendant had been punished once due to drunk driving, the fact that blood alcohol level is very high, traffic accidents have occurred, traffic accidents have occurred, the fact that the defendant had been punished several times due to the crime of this type, which is disadvantageous to the defendant, on the other hand, while the defendant is recognized and reflected in the crime, the criminal records of this type are sentenced to a fine in 2003, the criminal records of the above drinking driving are sentenced to a fine in 203, traffic accidents are very minor contacts, traffic accidents are very minor contact incidents, and after the suspended sentence was sentenced to a suspended sentence due to the crime of this type of crime in 203, it is decided as per Disposition by taking into account all other sentencing conditions stated in the records of

arrow