logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2015.07.16 2014나53554
공사대금 등
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation in this case are as follows: Gap evidence Nos. 13-1 to 4, Gap evidence Nos. 14, 15, 16, Gap evidence No. 17-1, and Eul evidence No. 17-2, and the testimony of the witness M of the court of first instance, which are evidence additionally presented at the court of first instance, are difficult to believe some of them, or they are good, except for the cases where the plaintiff A added that it is not sufficient to acknowledge the fact that the plaintiff entered into a subcontract with the defendant for the construction work of this case with the defendant, and therefore it is cited as it is in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow