A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

However, the execution of punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 11:00 on May 2, 2016, the Defendant seeks to discount the victim C’s “in order to raise funds necessary for business,” to raise funds for the victim C at the square of Young-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul. The Defendant

One copy of a blank bill to be provided only as a security without distributing it. It will be returned together with the honorarium 20 million won after 2-3 days.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false representation.”

However, when the defendant was provided with bills from the injured party, he was expected to provide D, which is the place where the business was prepared, to supplement the blank part, and there was no intention or ability to pay 20 million won to the injured party due to the lack of property or income.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victims, received a letter of promissory note from the issuer E, E, F, par value, and issue date, respectively.

2. The Defendant, who forged or falsified securities, issued to D a promissory note 1 that acquired by deception as above, should be provided only as security with blanks, even though he/she should be provided only as security in blanks.

Since then, D borrowed KRW 15 million from the provision to G in the face value, the date of payment, the date of issuance, the date of issuance, and the date of issuance, respectively, after the entry into the face value as “Won 34,000,000” and “Won 4, 2016.”

Accordingly, the Defendant, without authority, conspired with D to forge a promissory note in the name of E, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in each statement protocol C and D;

1. Articles 347(1), 214, and 217 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 37 and 38 of the Criminal Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The victim C, upon the request of the defendant, is requested to the issuer E again for the reasons for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act.