The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasons for appeal (two years and six months of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Although the Defendant recognized the instant thief crime, the Defendant was punished several times for the same thief crime, but the Defendant, during the period of repeated crime, stolen the victim’s things intending to commit the instant thief crime, which was committed again during two months after being released from prison, and did not yet agree with the victim, and there was no special circumstance or circumstance that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment.

In addition, given that the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the instant records and arguments, such as the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is groundless.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.