logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.08.30 2019고단2289
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment] The Defendant: (a) was permitted to use a personal business entity as a meat retailer in the place of business located in Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do; (b) was registered in the name of D on November 13, 2013 and used until November 4, 2014; and (c) on November 5, 2014, the Defendant used the name of E, the mother, while maintaining the trade name and the place of business on the same date.

Meanwhile, on October 31, 2013, while operating a business entity, the Defendant continuously traded meat from around October 31, 2013, which was operated by G to be supplied by G from the time when the Defendant continued to operate the business entity (including the establishment and operation of FF, which is the representative of E from April 3, 2017), and was KRW 8,3260,000 as of November 4, 2014 when the use of D’s business registration was completed, and the Defendant continued to trade in the name of E until the transaction is completed at KRW 34,703,00.

【Criminal Facts】

Although the relationship of D’s lending was terminated on November 5, 2014 as a business registration report of D on business closure, the Defendant, as seen above, expressed apprehensions about the Defendant’s transfer of D’s name to E and traded the Defendant’s business registration, and, as a personal security for continuous transactions in the future, accepted D’s request without permission, with the content that “An existing obligation arising under D’s name is jointly assumed by E, and D also bears the responsibility for continuing transactions in the future.” The Defendant, without permission, accepted D’s request that “The existing obligation arising under D’s name is jointly assumed by E, and D also bears the responsibility for continuing transactions in the future.” At will, the Defendant, without permission,

1. The Defendant forged private documents without authority for the purpose of uttering at the above C Office on December 2014, G’s continuous transaction obligation as above.

arrow