The defendant shall pay 30,00,000 won to the plaintiff and 12% per annum from January 4, 2020 to the day of complete payment.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 24, 2007, the Plaintiff and C are raising one minor child by the husband and wife who completed the marriage report.

B. 1) From December 2019, C began to teach the Defendant in good faith with the Defendant. Since being aware that C had a legal spouse, the Defendant knowingly performed unlawful acts, such as having sexual intercourse with C while teaching with C. As of the closing date of the pleadings in the instant case, C and the Defendant have contacted or met with C until the day of the conclusion of the pleadings. 2) The Defendant was convicted of summary indictment (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2020Da2859), resulting in the Defendant having entered the Plaintiff’s residence D Apartment E, Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, for the purpose of intercomponing with C over seven occasions on December 2019, and received a summary order of KRW 2 million. The above summary order became final and conclusive as it is.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 1, 3 through 21, 45, and 55, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

(a) A third party shall not interfere with a married couple’s communal living falling under the essence of marriage by interfering with a married couple’s communal living by causing a failure of a married couple’s communal living, etc. A third party shall not interfere with a married couple’s communal living falling under the essence of marriage by committing an unlawful act with the either side of the married couple, and a third party shall not interfere with a married couple’s communal living falling under the essence of marriage by infringing upon or maintaining a married couple’s communal living and by infringing on the right as the spouse’s right to it, in principle,

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 201Meu2997 Decided November 20, 2014).B.

1) According to the above facts, the defendant alleged that C had commenced school programs from around December 2019 with knowledge that C had a legal spouse (the plaintiff asserted that since September 2019, the plaintiff began school programs, but the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize it.

The C’s law is applicable by means of teaching and unlawful acts until September 2020.