logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.02.17 2015노2275
폭행
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The costs of litigation in the original judgment and the trial per party shall be borne by the defendant.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The victim was not the victim of mistake of facts.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. (1) In light of the spirit of substantial direct and psychological principle adopted by the Korean Criminal Procedure Act, the first instance judgment on the credibility of the statement made by the witness of the first instance court was clearly erroneous.

Unless there are extenuating circumstances to view that maintaining the first instance court's decision on the credibility of the statement made by the witness of the first instance trial is significantly unfair, or in full view of the results of the first instance court's examination and the results of the additional examination of evidence up to the closing of oral proceedings, the appellate court shall respect the judgment on the credibility of the statement made by the witness of the first instance trial (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Do4994, Nov. 24, 2006). (2) The lower court directly examined D, E, etc. and found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case by recognizing the credibility of the testimony. The lower court's judgment on the above testimony was clearly erroneous.

It is not deemed that there are special circumstances or maintenance of the judgment is not significantly unfair.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.

B. In full view of the following: (a) all of the sentencing conditions shown in the instant sentencing records and arguments and the Defendant’s criminal records and the fact that there is no agreement with the victim, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit, and the costs of the lawsuit are decided as per Disposition in accordance with Articles 191 (1), 190 (1), and 186 (1) (main sentence) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow