A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

At around 14:15 on August 10, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported the form of “Dprefabricated-type warehouse,” in which the victim C, who was divorced with B, is proceeding with the Defendant, to build a new construction, and then damaged the emerculation of the emerculation and 14 windows (a 60 cm, 60 cm) in the warehouse in the emerculation, which is a dangerous object, and damaged the emerculation of the emerculation and 14 cm (a 60 cm, emerc) in the warehouse in the emerci.g., the emercian-type warehouse, which is a dangerous object in the emerci.g., the Defendant destroyed the glass window by destroying it at the window, and continuously damaged the emerc-type and 50 glus of the emerc in the emerc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of C and E;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, Article 366 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Jan. 1, 201; Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 2, 201)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary mitigation);