1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. On February 13, 2018, this Court rendered a request for a stay of compulsory execution against 2018 Chicago7.

1. On January 30, 2018, the Plaintiff asserted that, based on the executory decision of performance recommendation rendered by the Busan District Court Decision 2013Da30479 on D, the Defendant enforced compulsory execution as to the movable property listed in the Attachment List (hereinafter “instant movable property”) on January 30, 2018. Since the instant movable property is owned by the Plaintiff, the Defendant’s compulsory execution is unreasonable.

With respect to whether the movable property of this case is owned by the plaintiff, it is not sufficient to recognize the movable property of this case only with the descriptions of Gap evidence 1 through 5, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is not correct.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is not legitimate, and it is so decided as per Disposition.