1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons why the court has cited the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case are as stated in the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows:

Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act) 3 pages 1 and 3 are as follows.

Part 4 10 Insufficient Evidence, “The statements and images of evidence Nos. 11-1, 2, and 12-1 to 5 of the evidence No. 12, and Eul Nos. 14 and 15” are added.

Part 4, from the 11th century, “13 conduct” can be known. “B” is as follows:

Rather, in full view of the results of the appraiser B’s appraisal of the first instance trial and the trial, the Plaintiff asserted that the appraiser C’s appraisal result was conducted in a state of arbitrary manipulation and did not have been conducted again, but did not have been conducted again. Accordingly, the appraiser B’s appraisal was conducted in the first instance trial. Although the appraiser B attempted to run a trial on August 31, 2013 when the original was put into a state of trial (in the first instance trial), it was not conducted as a result of the Defendant’s refusal to cooperate. On the day of the trial trial, the Plaintiff confirmed that the Plaintiff used the water tank to treat smoke in the recent period of the trial operation and the smoke of smoke, and that the Plaintiff used the water tank to treat smoke in the process of the trial operation, and that the Plaintiff did not operate the water tank as a part of the trial operation, the Plaintiff’s inspection system was conducted in the state of the defect during which the Plaintiff was in the state of non-driving of the machinery during the trial operation.