logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.02.04 2014노3385
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for not less than one year and four months, and additional collection for 100,000 won) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the judgment, there are favorable circumstances such as the confession of each of the crimes of this case and the defendant's mistake against himself, the defendant's act of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the court below's agreement with the victims of the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (unclaimed measures after accidents) and the defendant's act of violation of the Road Traffic Act (the victim of this case), the victims are not wanting to be punished against the defendant, and the defendant's opportunity to be satisfed and satisfed through confinement life for about seven months, the defendant's economic situation is not good, and if the sentence of this case becomes final

However, each of the crimes in this case is administered by the defendant, and is driving without a license.

A serious punishment is required for narcotics crimes in light of the fact that two vehicles in a traffic accident have escaped without taking necessary measures and destroying them and the nature of the crime is not good, and the social harm caused by narcotics and the necessity of eradicating them is serious. A unauthorized driving is not less than that of the crime in that it is highly likely to cause harm to the life and body of others, and the criminal records of criminal punishment for narcotics or traffic crimes are ten times and not less than seven times, and the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months and a fine of five hundred thousand won for the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Daegu District Court on July 13, 2012, and on March 2, 2013, and without being able to take account of the circumstances at the disadvantage of the crime in this case, such as the fact that the defendant again committed the crime in this case during the period of a repeated crime, and the fact that the defendant committed the crime in this case during the period of a repeated crime, the age, character and behavior of the defendant, circumstances, etc.

arrow