A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, at around 01:40 on February 15, 2017, recommended the Defendant to pay and return back a taxi fee to the police officer at the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Gangnam-gu Police Station F commander of the Seoul Gangnam-gu Police Station, who was under the influence of alcohol and attempted to flee without paying the taxi fee, and who was the police officer at the police station affiliated with the Seoul Gangnam-gu Police Station F commander of the police station, who was called out to the said area. The Defendant, at around 01:40 on February 15, 2017, recommended the said D to pay and return a taxi fee.

“Along with the intention of the Defendant to notify the Defendant of the penalty, the above D asked the Defendant as soon as possible by asking the part, such as the left hand hand, etc. of the above D, and used the victim’s artificial intercourse, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of treatment.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order of the above D and the handling of the 112 reported case, and at the same time injured the victim D.

2. The Defendant, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph 1, committed an injury to the Victim G and interfered with the performance of official duties, was found to have attempted to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender and get him to board the patrol vehicle for committing the same crime as that of paragraph 1 of this Article, which is a police officer belonging to the Seoul Gangnam Police Station F police box (28 years old). As soon as possible, the Defendant asked the Victim G on one occasion of the parts of the above G’s arm’s length and carried out an injury, such as an open top of the part below the right line requiring approximately two weeks medical treatment.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with legitimate performance of duties concerning the maintenance of order in the above G and the handling of 112 reported cases, and at the same time inflicted injury on the victim G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, D and G;

1. A damaged photograph;

1. A taxi receipt;

1. A medical certificate or an injury medical certificate;

1. Application of investigation report (G's photographs damaged by Acts and subordinate statutes);

1. In cases of injury to each of the relevant Articles of the Criminal Act: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act that interferes with the performance of official duties: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code of Trade and Trade (the crime of injury to D).