The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant’s act of mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles constitutes self-defense.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court’s determination on the assertion of mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal doctrine is based on facts acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, and it is difficult to view the Defendant’s act of assault as a passive defense.

The defendant's assertion on this is without merit.

3. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court’s judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing, and where the first instance court’s sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). Based on the foregoing legal doctrine, the lower court, based on the foregoing legal doctrine, determined the sentence by comprehensively taking account of the various circumstances as stated in its reasoning.

In addition to the circumstances indicated by the lower court, no new circumstance exists to change the sentence of the lower court in the trial, and even considering all the sentencing factors indicated in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s sentencing is too excessive to exceed the reasonable scope of discretion.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

4. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.