1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff's assertion was the chief of the legal office, and the plaintiff became aware of the defendant while providing legal counseling.

The Defendant made a proposal to the Plaintiff and started the business, and the Defendant did not pay money to the Plaintiff, and the Defendant provided a house with money.

Around December 29, 2014, the Defendant lent KRW 24 million to a third party while running a secondhand sales business, and thereafter, the business was closed due to the flow of the secondhand sales business.

Therefore, when the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant to pay the above loans of KRW 24 million, the Defendant took over the above loans until he has repaid the money, and avoided the contact of the Plaintiff after providing the Plaintiff with C UAD while avoiding the contact, and around March 30, 2016, the said AUD car was delivered and executed by the Seoul Central District Court 2016Kadan34378, and recovered it from the owner of the vehicle.

Therefore, the defendant is obliged to return the loan 24 million won and interest for delay to the plaintiff.

B. The Defendant’s assertion that the Plaintiff and the Nonparty did not engage in the sales business, but also runs a credit business that offers money by taking money as security between November 2014 and May 2015 from those who need money to those who need money.

The plaintiff directly contracted the credit business office, and the office house was also purchased by the plaintiff.

The amount of KRW 24 million sent by the Plaintiff to the Defendant is used to make a car as security and as a loan from the customer.

Last, the customer was entitled to receive the loan, but the plaintiff was unable to receive the loan because he did not return the vehicle to another person, and the vehicle is recovered from the vehicle owner.

After all, the defendant.