logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.10.13 2016고정1771
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of acting as an agent for a motor vehicle of Lastren.

On July 2, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 03:10 on July 2, 2016, and proceeded in accordance with the straight line between the three-lane road in front of the front of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, 71-ro 71-gil, and then turn to the left in the direction of the Nowon-gu, in violation of the signal.

At the time, since the signal is an intersection installed, the driver of the motor vehicle is obliged to safely drive the motor vehicle and prevent the accident in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle, such as checking whether there is a person who gets off the road by reducing the speed and checking well the right and the right, because there is a crosswalk on the right and right side of the motor vehicle, while the driver of the motor vehicle follows the traffic signals.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and received a straight-on signal, and reported the fact that the vehicle was not driven on the opposite side, and reported it to the left, and did not turn to the left at the right side of the crosswalk installed on the right side of the left side, and did not discover the bicycle of the victim D(50 years old) driving a bicycle on the right side from the left side of the bicycle due to the occupational negligence that did not discover the bicycle of the victim D(50 years old) and caused the damaged person to go to the road.

Defendant 1 caused injury to the victim, such as salked salk, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence, and, at the same time, Defendant 1 left away without taking necessary measures such as aiding the damaged person by stopping the bicycle immediately, even though Defendant 2 destroyed the bicycle so that the repair cost can be recovered, such as the wheel quis, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. The portion of the statement made by the witness D in the third public trial protocol;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Meato (a note of the person to whom the note is written).

arrow