logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.12.05 2013고단5901
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

20,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 25, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor or two years of suspended execution for larceny at the Busan District Court on July 25, 2013, and the judgment was finalized on August 2, 2013, and is not a narcotics handler.

At around 22:40 on April 12, 2013, the Defendant purchased and sold a psychotropic drug, which is a psychotropic drug, from the bottom of the injectr for daily use to the fourth level of snow 4th.

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s statement;

1. Some statements of the suspect interrogation protocol and copy of each prosecutor's office against the defendant and C;

1. Each prosecutor's statement concerning C;

1. Records of seizure by prosecution;

1. Responses to requests for the provision of communication confirmation data;

1. Investigation reports (Attachment, etc. of correspondence data);

1. Previous records: Criminal records and investigation reports (verification of recent trials of suspects, and copies of rulings) and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 60 (1) 2, 4 (1) 1, and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. of Specific Crimes;

1. Handling concurrent crimes: The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act (trade between the crime at the time of sale and the first head of the judgment);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition, by comprehensively taking into account the factors favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant does not reflect the fact that the reason for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (the purchase price of Handphones) was not against the Defendant’s crime of trading the Handphones in this case, and there was no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and the fact that the defendant

arrow