logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.09.12 2018고단2635
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

One broom (No. 5) which is seized shall be returned to the person who is not his/her name.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around June 2018, the Defendant embezzled, as he/she had, one of the following procedures: (a) he/she found a broom (FIT broadband: Smart IT Do) and returned it to the victim, which is owned by a person who was lost his/her name in front of the 32 king post office in Singu, Sinung-si, Do; and (b) he/she embezzled his/her own idea without following necessary procedures.

2. On July 19, 2018, the Defendant found the door keyss kept by mail in the victim D's house that he/she had stolen the article from around 13:35 on July 19, 2018, and infringed upon the victim's residence by opening the door door with the said key and entering the house.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place stated in the above paragraph 2 above, stolen by inserting dESL North Korea, 1 LGGG4 portable phone in an amount equivalent to 750,000 won in the market value, 50,000 won in the market value, 1 penc meter in an amount equivalent to 150,000 won in the market value, 50,000 won in the market value, 1 penc meter in an amount equivalent to dORS assistant dORS assistant dORS assistant, 1 copy in the city, 1 copy in the People’s 19 minutes in shopping bags.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. CCTV images;

1. Application of statutes on records of seizure and lists of seizure;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act that provides for the choice of punishment (section 329), Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intrusion upon residence), Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of embezzlement of deserted articles in possession), and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The sentencing conditions under Article 333(1) of the Return Criminal Procedure Act, including the Defendant’s age, sex, family relation, etc., shall be determined by taking into account the following normal relation:

- Unfavorable circumstances: The planned criminal facts, the circumstances that have the same kind of punishment, and the favorable circumstances: The fact that the confessions and reflects, and the fact that the other thefts except for cash 50,000 won have been returned.

arrow