Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 27, 2018, from around 23:00 to February 01:0, 2018, the Defendant, B, C, and D carried out a gambling of F2-story housing site located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, by using 52 card to set off one copy of the first four card, which is not necessary to receive the first four pages, on the floor, and 5,000 won with three pages, until the card becomes 7, and gambling one until the card becomes 7. The Defendant, B, and D got a half of the total amount of money every time a person who is the highest in the number of gamblings the highest at approximately 30 times in the manner of having the card in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against B, C, or D;

1. A copy of a protocol of seizure, a list of seizure and a general list of seized articles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the site and seized articles;

1. The main sentence of Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act [favorable circumstances] of the Criminal Procedure Act for the instant crime is that the Defendant gamblinged at KRW 3,194,00 in total. The nature of the instant crime is not that of the crime in light of the details and contents of the crime.

Defendant has been punished by committing the same kind of crime.

[The favorable circumstances] The Defendant appears to be against the view of committing the instant crime.

The defendant has no record of punishment heavier than a fine due to the same crime.

In addition, the sentencing factors indicated in the trial process of this case, such as the defendant's age and reputation, character and health status, environment and family relationship, motive and background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered in comprehensive consideration.