logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2014.02.18 2013고정69
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant in the name of "D" in South Won-si.

No person shall make a false indication of origin or make an indication which may cause confusion as to the origin.

Nevertheless, the Defendant purchased 270 kg (10 kg per one box x 27 boxes) from July 4, 2013 to October 13 of the same year, and provided approximately KRW 194 g of the above 194 g to many unspecified consumers for the purpose of providing approximately 16 kg for the purpose of supporting, while keeping approximately 16 g of the above g of the g of the g of the g of the g of the g of the g of the country of origin in the above g of the g of the g of Korea with the country of origin indicated the country of origin of the g of the g of the g of the g of the g of the Korean g of the Republic of Korea as a domestic origin.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement of detection;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (specific details of the purchase of memorial kimchi);

1. Relevant Articles 15 and 6 (2) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and the Selection of Punishment for Criminal Facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (the suspended sentence: fine of 1,00,000 won for a fine of 1,00,000 won, and the waived kimchi sold as domestic acid by a seller distinguished from the Republic of Korea; unlike the previous one, the violation of the Act in this case is deemed to have been committed because it was not sufficiently aware of any changes in the method of indicating the country of origin that should be marked up to the country of origin of the red molds powder, and there are circumstances that may be considered in the motive and circumstance of the crime; the defendant is a first offender with no criminal power; and the defendant is hard enough to correct the violation of the Act and not repeat the crime due to the instant case (the previous situation is remarkable)

arrow