logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.04.04 2013가합510130
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant ordered the plaintiffs to order the buildings falling under the following paragraph (1), and (2) the amount falling under paragraph (b).

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The 4th floor, which is a sales facility, among the buildings owned by the building and the 17th floor above the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Office building (hereinafter the building in this case), is 85 partitioned buildings. The plaintiffs divided 23 of the 23 stores of this case as stated in the 1-A of the disposition No. 1.

(The rest of the fourth floor is divided by Korea Asset Trust Co., Ltd.). Around December 2006, the sectional owners of the instant building, including Doshe V, appointed a manager who does not smoothly rent the 1-8th floor, a commercial building, after the completion of the instant building, and convened a meeting of the management body of August 19, 2010 (the special meeting of the management body of the management body of the instant building; hereinafter referred to as “the instant meeting”) to discuss the method of operating the commercial building and the method of activation.

At the time, the remaining plaintiffs except the plaintiffs A, D, and F submitted the "call consent and power of attorney" in relation to the management body meeting of this case, and the clients are sectional owners.

1. Appointment of management body meeting and manager:

2. Cases of handling agenda items concerning the establishment of management regulations and the operation of commercial buildings;

3. He/she agrees to convene an extraordinary general meeting, the purpose of which is to resolve the overall matters concerning the revitalization of commercial buildings and to handle agenda items, and includes the procedure for convening an extraordinary general meeting, the deliberation on agenda items, the exercise of voting rights, etc., and delegates the following authority to the mandatary:

The content of "" is written, and the mandatary's term is in the blank.

Then, at the meeting of the management body of this case, V is appointed as the manager;

(a) became aware of the appointment of an administrator;

2.not regarding the operation of the building;

3. An agenda item, such as a resolution on the overall revitalization of commercial buildings, was resolved upon.

Around that time, the management body publicly announced that the agenda item was passed at the extraordinary meeting at “31,390 square meters in total, 414 persons among sectional owners, gender ratio of 18,418.84 square meters, 58.7%, 257 persons, 62.08% in total.”

In the case of the management rules, a quorum.

arrow