1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for 22,424,194 won and the period from December 19, 2017 to May 12, 2020.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) The Plaintiff is a D vehicle (hereinafter “victim”).

Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant insurance company”).

E) For the E-owned vehicles (hereinafter referred to as “Korea-Japan”).

Defendant C Co., Ltd (hereinafter “Defendant C”) is an insurance company that entered into an automobile insurance contract.

F. 2) On December 19, 2017, F, as the driver of the vehicle driving in the opposite line, was carrying a scrap metal to the extent that the driver’s seat is not well visible, while proceeding the road adjacent to the equipment office in the Samcheon Power Development Headquarters of the G Company, and attempted to turn to the left at a three-distance level, the damaged vehicle that far far far passed from the opposite line while trying to turn to the left.

(hereinafter “instant accident.” The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as an overfashion of the viscosium, an overfashion of the viscosium, an overfashion of the viscosium, and an annual organization leader.

3) The Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service recognized the instant accident as an occupational accident and paid the Plaintiff KRW 23,242,440 of temporary layoff benefits from December 19, 2017 to November 6, 2018, medical care benefits of KRW 12,045,640 of disability benefits, and disability benefits of KRW 6,275,610 of disability benefits, respectively, for the period of the medical care from December 19, 2017 to November 6, 2018.

each entry and video of the Corporation, the fact inquiry inquiry inquiry results on the director of the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. 1) According to the above recognition of liability, the driver of a sea-going vehicle caused the instant accident by neglecting his duty of care to prevent the accident, even though he had a duty of care to view the front door, so the Defendant insurance company is the insurer of the sea-going vehicle, and the Defendant C is jointly and severally liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damage caused by the instant accident (see Supreme Court Decision 2010Da53754, Oct. 28, 2010) as the user of the sea-going vehicle (see Supreme Court Decision 2010Da53754, Oct. 28, 201).