logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.11.28 2017누75165
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the court of first instance is not different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's claim is justified even if the evidence submitted at the court of first instance showed each description of evidence No. 6 or No. 10, which was additionally submitted at the court of first instance.

Therefore, the reasoning for the statement concerning this case is as follows: (a) the court added "(including additional numbers)" to "(5)" following the "Evidence Nos. 2, 10, 10, and (b) the "Evidence No. 1, 5" to "No. 3, 4," and the ground for the judgment of the first instance is identical to that of "No. 5, 3, 3, 4, and therefore, (b) the administrative litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are cited.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow