beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 46,152,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from May 29, 2014 to February 5, 2015.
Reasons
1. The Plaintiff’s determination as to the cause of the claim is based on the Defendant’s total of KRW 54,252,00, and KRW 56,752,00,000, and KRW 56,752,00,00, and damages for delay.
First, with respect to the construction cost, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the total construction cost of KRW 54,252,00 and delay damages for the construction cost of KRW 30,718,00,00 for the construction cost (i.e., KRW 27,00,000 for the construction cost of KRW 3,718,00 for the construction cost of KRW 3718,000 for the construction cost of KRW 27,000 for the construction cost), and KRW 68,000 for the construction cost of Da-gun, and KRW 16,734,00 for the D forest road construction cost of KRW 16,734,00 for the construction cost of KRW 54,252,00 for the Plaintiff, barring special circumstances.
Next, it is not sufficient to recognize that the Defendant, only on the basis of the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, as to the lodging expenses of the accommodation accommodation, had the Plaintiff’s husband borne the accommodation expenses incurred during the period of the establishment work, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim for this portion is not acceptable.
2. Judgment on the defendant's defense
A. The Defendant claiming deduction of KRW 8,100,000 paid to E shall deduct KRW 8,100,000 paid for the work from the Plaintiff’s wage for E and its work employees in the Zone B. Thus, in full view of health class, Eul’s evidence Nos. 4 and 5, and the purport of the whole pleading in witness E’s testimony, E and F shall, at the Plaintiff’s request, participate in the work of piling up at the Plaintiff’s request, and paid KRW 8,100,000 to E, so it can be recognized that the Defendant paid KRW 8,10,000,000 paid to E, and this part of the Defendant’s claim for deduction has merit.
B. The defendant's assertion of set-off against the damage compensation due to C-Dried construction works shall be pointed out from the ordering place due to the plaintiff's work falling short of quality.