The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A’s superior wife suffered from Defendant A’s act

In addition, it is difficult to readily conclude that the above Defendant was injured by B in the process of dulging B, merely because it is merely a sulging B with his flaps.

Even if there was an intentional injury to the above defendant

It is difficult to see, and even if the intention of injury is recognized, the above defendant's act constitutes a justifiable act.

B. Defendant B 1) The misunderstanding of the fact that Defendant B 1 did not inflict an injury on A only by having A take a larlar.

2) The sentence of the lower court that is unfair in sentencing (one million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

(c)

According to the prosecutor (Defendant B), according to the evidence of misunderstanding the facts, the fact that Defendant B inflicted a bodily injury upon G when he is click.

2) The lower court’s sentence against Defendant B, who was unfair in sentencing, is too unhued and unfair.

2. Although this part of the facts charged against Defendant A stated the part of the facts charged in this case, the part of the facts charged in this case is "quih to the victim B's hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand, and the prosecutor stated that " hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand

According to evidence, it is acknowledged that B discovered Defendant A and first carried Defendant A's chest part, and the site of this case was an apartment parking lot, but Defendant A was an apartment parking lot, and Defendant A was on board his own vehicle after dusting the arms of Party B, which he gets into a cell area in the situation where Defendant A was able to get a cell, and that there was no physical conflict between Defendant A and B.

In full view of the above facts and the fact that Defendant A’s exercise of force against Defendant A was limited to one time, the said Defendant was above duplicating B’s arms.