logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.06.19 2014고정551
부정수표단속법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative director of C, and on September 22, 201, entered into a check contract with the office of the NAF under the name of the above company and entered into a check contract with the office of peaceful branch of the NAF and entered into the check transaction

The Defendant held the above company seal imprint and check forms to D, and entrusted D with all rights to the issuance of checks in the name of the said company.

1. On November 7, 201, the Defendant, in collusion with D, issued one check number “F”, “F”, “20,000,000,000”, and “F” in the name of the said company, in collusion with D, and issued one check number in the name of the said company.

On February 7, 2012, the holder of the check presented the check payment to the Nonghyup on February 7, 2012.

However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

2. On November 27, 201, the Defendant, in collusion with D, issued one check number “G”, par value “9,000,000”, and one copy of the number of shares per the said Nonghyup in the name of the said company, which became the date of issuance “ February 25, 2012.”

On February 27, 2012, the holder of the check presented the check payment to the Nonghyup on February 27, 2012.

However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

3. On November 29, 201, the Defendant, in collusion with D, issued one check number “H”, “H”, “30,000,000”, and “date of issuance” in the name of the said company as the check number “H”, “H”, “30,000,000”, in collusion with D, and issued one check number under the name of the said company.

On February 29, 2012, the holder of the check presented the check payment to the Nonghyup on February 29, 2012.

However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Statement D in the suspect examination protocol to be replaced by the prosecution against the accused and D;

1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes entered in each accusation and certified transcript of register;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Control Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

arrow