logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.03.13 2019고단2782
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] The Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on January 24, 2018, and the record on October 13, 2018 reveals that according to the records, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence as stated in the judgment on October 13, 2018, and was finally released from prison on December 2, 2018 after the execution of a fine for negligence to the Defendant on December 2, 2018. The completion date of the execution of the sentence stated in the judgment is recognized as above ex officio.

The execution of the sentence was completed.

【Criminal Facts】

1. At around 05:00 on February 20, 2019, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim B and C, with one unit of LGG G5 smartphone in an amount of KRW 600,000 in the market price owned by the victim B, which was located in the e-mail or male slope room located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, and one unit of Samsung G5 smartphone in an amount of KRW 600,000 in the market price owned by the victim C, which was located adjacent thereto, and two units of smartphones were stolen, respectively.

2. According to the records of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Building G building at around 06:00 on February 20, 2019, the Defendant committed the crime against the Victim F, the “I” as stated in the written indictment is obvious that it is a clerical error, and thus, is corrected.

In the light of H H, the victim F, who was aware of his mobile phone loaned the cell phone to the victim F and used it temporarily, and the mobile phone dealer stolens one Samsung gal lusium S8 smartphone in an amount equivalent to KRW 900,000 in the market value of the victim's ownership by using it as it is for selling it to the mobile phone dealer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Investigation report (victim B telephone communications) and investigation report (victim C telephone communications);

1. A photograph of damaged goods, investigation report (verification of actual users of opgal lusium 78), prepaid mobile telephone contract;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as inquiry results, investigation reports, and status of confinement of individuals;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, respectively;

arrow